-
The “proof” contradicts itself
by: Paul W. Sharkey The “proof” contradicts itself, commits the fallacy of composition/division, and ignores empirical fact. Specifically: If energy can neither be created nor… -
Nearly all creation stories describe physical processes
by: Kristine Robinson Hi Will. Just a couple of things from your response: “God is not the most well-defined term in the world, but just… -
Searching for a nonphysical cause does not, by itself, make one unscientific.
by: Will Petillo Kristine, Although I agree with your conclusions, I don’t think your specific criticism quite hits the mark. My reason for saying this… -
Energy cannot be created or destroyed
by: Andrew This author seems to quote the law of thermodynamics then interpret them leaving out certain parts that would make his argument in this… -
Intention as the prime driving force made a lot of intuitive sense
by: Will Petillo I’ve been having trouble sustaining motivation to write lately (a shame, because I was just starting to write halfway readable sci-fi) so… -
Part of the natural order.
by: Jonathan H. B. Lobl Mr. Marcellino is insisting that the second law of thermodynamics proves the existence of God; by proving that the Universe… -
Taking on “Challenge 3”
by: Kristine Robinson I think having a doctorate from IUN (my favourite university) would be fun and a huge boost for my ego, so looking… -
Conclusive Proof of God? Yeah, right!
A challenge: Earn a doctorate from IUN by responding to the proof below. I came across a website – http://www.conclusiveproofofgod.com/ which is selling a book… -
A Hopefully Not Heated Argument
by: Paul W. Sharkey In my initial response to this challenge I was motivated by two factors: First to avoid having to go into a… -
It may just be poorly written
by: Will Petillo ews (or any other,) please use the Contact form. This discussion has been continued. I am not sure the article contradicts itself;…