-
It’s an appeal to Cartesian Doubt
by: Rev. Dr. Incitatus Regarding the discussion on the First Article of Faith, I think this part of JT’s recent post is all important: “But… -
The possibility of knowing something that amounts to less than the “whole subject”.
by: Clay Chesney I heartily agree with Darwin that “the whole subject of God is beyond the scope of man’s intellect”, but that isn’t to… -
Another line of reasoning
by: Christian Bieck Let me try another line of reasoning. Which of the following statements is false (if any) and why: Any self-aware being knows… -
I want you to commit to a definition
by: Christian Bieck JT, the wordplay was intentional to get past the wordplay of the Articles – I wanted to gradually get you to commit… -
Operational definitions required
by: DEI It has been rather frustrating for me to try to follow the exchanges regarding this topic from its beginning in Meditation 832 not… -
Nothing unknowable can exist
by: Christian Bieck Reverend Incitatus, You write “So, that the rational standard of our first article of faith is not deductively concrete is besides the… -
Problems with the first Article of Faith
by: Christian Bieck I discovered your website last week and have spent quite a few hours now perusing it – there is a lot of… -
Some things are unknowable!
by: JT . Christian: You do understand, don’t you, that it’s a basic principle in particle physics that some things are unknowable. NEXT -
I’m still content with the first article
by: JT First of all, Christian, I want to make a point of clarification which probably is not necessary for you, but might be for… -
Existence is never in doubt in a rule-based world
by: Christian Bieck . JT, Sure, but that’s something quite different – you know the particle exists, you just cannot determine its position once you…