-
Searching for a nonphysical cause does not, by itself, make one unscientific.
by: Will Petillo Kristine, Although I agree with your conclusions, I don’t think your specific criticism quite hits the mark. My reason for saying this… -
Why A Creator God?
by: Paul W. Sharkey For reasons not worth relating here, I have recently begun to wonder why anyone would believe in the existence of a… -
Part of the natural order.
by: Jonathan H. B. Lobl Mr. Marcellino is insisting that the second law of thermodynamics proves the existence of God; by proving that the Universe… -
A Hopefully Not Heated Argument
by: Paul W. Sharkey In my initial response to this challenge I was motivated by two factors: First to avoid having to go into a… -
Why I Am Agnostic (Part IX)
By: Robert Green Ingersoll I took another step. What is matter — substance? Can it be destroyed — annihilated? Is it possible to conceive of… -
Why I Am Agnostic (Part VIII)
By: Robert Green Ingersoll The theologians had always insisted that their God was the creator of all living things — that the forms, parts, functions,… -
Why I Am Agnostic (Part X)
By: Robert Green Ingersoll This God must be, if he exists, a person — a conscious being. Who can imagine an infinite personality? This God… -
Beware of Exploding Arguments
by: DEI At the end of his otherwise mostly perceptive commentary regarding the agnostic-atheist exchange between our Patriarch and Professor Massimo Pigliucci, Will Petillo offers… -
Still More on Russell’s Teapot
by: JT I notice that I have discussed Russell’s teapot in space in Ask the Patriarch 48: Teapots, Unicorns, & Gods where I asserted “flatly… -
More on Russell’s Teapot
by: Will Petillo I was thinking recently on the teapot analogy, which was originally used to take the burden of proof off religious skeptics for…