-
There are no examples which truly support Intelligent Design – not one.
by: JT Michael: I think you have some fundamentally flawed assumptions about evolution. You provide specific examples of the blowhole on a whale and the… -
Your demand for scientific proof will become irrelevant.
by: Ben I felt inclined to share a couple of thoughts. First, that I completely enjoy reading the thoughts of anyone who takes the time… -
It is not a meaningful prediction
by: JT Rob: No doubt you think that wilful misrepresentation of science that you reference is meaningful, but it is not. To argue (as does… -
Response to Nine Problems With Evolution
by: Clay Chesney I am not a paleontologist but have had some brushes with the subject, so I offer the following comments. I appreciate Mr.… -
I disagree with the current ‘definition’ of science
by: Rob Lockett JT, you are correct in your analysis that ID is not science. That’s what I said. There is no misrepresentation on my… -
The simplicity of the scientific method
by: Rob Lockett The simplicity of the scientific method Questions: Is science empirical? What exactly is science? Beginning with the relevant terms, science is simply… -
Science is not what Rob wants it to be
by: JT `I don’t know what you mean by “glory,”‘ Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. `Of course you don’t — till I tell you.… -
ID is not Science
by: JT Rob: I see why you want to attack that definition of science. Right at the top of the page you quoted from it… -
Comments on 9 Problems with Evolution
by: jackdaw These so called “problems” with evolution are nothing of the sort. Indeed, Mr. Turnipseed ignores his own advice. He hasn’t studied his enemy.… -
Science is a Religion
by: Rob Lockett JT, your comments are expected. And for the record, I do not believe that the definition of science will be changed meaningfully…