-
Debate & Discourse
by: Rob Lockett Dear Will and Jorge, I don’t know that a discussion is possible since we cannot agree upon the meaning of words. I… -
Debate & Discourse
by: JT I responded to Rob Lockett’s last by telling him this discussion is now over. He replied saying Sounds like I hit a nerve…… -
It is not a meaningful prediction
by: JT Rob: No doubt you think that wilful misrepresentation of science that you reference is meaningful, but it is not. To argue (as does… -
I disagree with the current ‘definition’ of science
by: Rob Lockett JT, you are correct in your analysis that ID is not science. That’s what I said. There is no misrepresentation on my… -
The simplicity of the scientific method
by: Rob Lockett The simplicity of the scientific method Questions: Is science empirical? What exactly is science? Beginning with the relevant terms, science is simply… -
ID and Empiricism
by: Will Petillo Editor’s Note: This response was written by Will Petillo before Rob Lockett made a major revision to Discussion 10. However, I think… -
Science is not what Rob wants it to be
by: JT `I don’t know what you mean by “glory,”‘ Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. `Of course you don’t — till I tell you.… -
ID is not Science
by: JT Rob: I see why you want to attack that definition of science. Right at the top of the page you quoted from it… -
Science is a Religion
by: Rob Lockett JT, your comments are expected. And for the record, I do not believe that the definition of science will be changed meaningfully… -
Some Further Points of Clarification
by: Will Petillo I didn’t notice when writing my article that you quoted C.S. Lewis. Mad props to that, you are definitely an interlocutor to…